<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 152 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445261</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of the individual appellant in a clandestine removal case. Central Excise officers seized two Pouch Packing Machines manufacturing pan masala containing tobacco from an unregistered factory, along with goods and raw materials worth Rs. 15 lakhs. The tribunal found no tangible evidence connecting the appellant to actual manufacture or establishing him as manufacturer. Despite undisputed facts of seizure and clandestine operations, the tribunal held the appellant could not be treated as manufacturer liable for duty, interest and penalty. The demand order was set aside against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 152 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445261</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of the individual appellant in a clandestine removal case. Central Excise officers seized two Pouch Packing Machines manufacturing pan masala containing tobacco from an unregistered factory, along with goods and raw materials worth Rs. 15 lakhs. The tribunal found no tangible evidence connecting the appellant to actual manufacture or establishing him as manufacturer. Despite undisputed facts of seizure and clandestine operations, the tribunal held the appellant could not be treated as manufacturer liable for duty, interest and penalty. The demand order was set aside against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>