<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Overturned Due to Clerical Error in Consignee&#039;s Name; Court Rules Against Penalizing Genuine Mistakes.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72870</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty under Section 51(7)(b) of PVAT Act - it was merely a clerical mistake, that only the name of the consignee was wrongly mentioned while picking the name of the appellant from drop-down menu in the software used by the Noida Head Office of the appellant. - Penalty can be imposed to evade tax and not for bona fide mistake. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 12:33:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 12:33:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Overturned Due to Clerical Error in Consignee&#039;s Name; Court Rules Against Penalizing Genuine Mistakes.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72870</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty under Section 51(7)(b) of PVAT Act - it was merely a clerical mistake, that only the name of the consignee was wrongly mentioned while picking the name of the appellant from drop-down menu in the software used by the Noida Head Office of the appellant. - Penalty can be imposed to evade tax and not for bona fide mistake. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 12:33:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>