https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445218 The Appellate Tribunal condoned a two-day delay in e-filing the appeal, finding sufficient cause for the delay. The appeal contested the Adjudicating Authority's order rejecting the impleadment applications filed by the 'Assignee.' The liquidator, not the 'Assignee,' appealed this rejection. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, noting that the issue regarding the interpretation of Regulation 37 (A) under the IBC, 2016, need not be decided in this case. The Tribunal left the question of law open for determination in a more suitable case. en-us Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Nov 2023 08:20:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445218 The Appellate Tribunal condoned a two-day delay in e-filing the appeal, finding sufficient cause for the delay. The appeal contested the Adjudicating Authority's order rejecting the impleadment applications filed by the 'Assignee.' The liquidator, not the 'Assignee,' appealed this rejection. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, noting that the issue regarding the interpretation of Regulation 37 (A) under the IBC, 2016, need not be decided in this case. The Tribunal left the question of law open for determination in a more suitable case. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445218