https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310626 Interim bail was granted because the allegations in the FIR and short reply did not disclose a non-bailable offence against the two petitioners, and their continued custody could not be sustained on the basis of mechanically passed remand orders. The Court noted that the arresting officer should have informed them of the option of release on bail bonds or surety, and relied on the protection of personal liberty under Article 21. Exercising inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Court intervened to prevent illegal custody and directed that the petitioners' detention not continue on the impugned remand orders. en-us Tue, 09 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Nov 2023 19:17:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310626 Interim bail was granted because the allegations in the FIR and short reply did not disclose a non-bailable offence against the two petitioners, and their continued custody could not be sustained on the basis of mechanically passed remand orders. The Court noted that the arresting officer should have informed them of the option of release on bail bonds or surety, and relied on the protection of personal liberty under Article 21. Exercising inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Court intervened to prevent illegal custody and directed that the petitioners' detention not continue on the impugned remand orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310626