<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1628 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310621</link>
    <description>A statutory requirement compelling a constituent medical college of an autonomous private university to obtain affiliation from another university cannot override the parent university&#039;s academic autonomy under its special enactment. The challenged amendment in the medical education law expanded the definition of private medical institutions and made affiliation mandatory, but that regime was confined to admissions and fee regulation and did not authorise interference with the university&#039;s power to manage its own constituent college. The provision could not be saved by reading it down because doing so would create conflict with the special statute. Accordingly, the affiliation requirement was invalid to that extent and the amendment could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 19:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1628 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310621</link>
      <description>A statutory requirement compelling a constituent medical college of an autonomous private university to obtain affiliation from another university cannot override the parent university&#039;s academic autonomy under its special enactment. The challenged amendment in the medical education law expanded the definition of private medical institutions and made affiliation mandatory, but that regime was confined to admissions and fee regulation and did not authorise interference with the university&#039;s power to manage its own constituent college. The provision could not be saved by reading it down because doing so would create conflict with the special statute. Accordingly, the affiliation requirement was invalid to that extent and the amendment could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>