<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2162 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310619</link>
    <description>Where parties amicably settle their dispute and place the compromise on record, the Court may treat the settlement as the basis for ending pending criminal litigation and grant consequential relief. Here, the compromise covered FIRs for alleged IPC offences and complaint cases under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, so the criminal proceedings were quashed. The return of the passport followed as a direct consequential direction in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 19:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2162 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310619</link>
      <description>Where parties amicably settle their dispute and place the compromise on record, the Court may treat the settlement as the basis for ending pending criminal litigation and grant consequential relief. Here, the compromise covered FIRs for alleged IPC offences and complaint cases under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, so the criminal proceedings were quashed. The return of the passport followed as a direct consequential direction in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>