<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1804 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310605</link>
    <description>A CBDT circular enhancing the monetary limit for departmental appeals before the ITAT was treated as applicable to pending appeals as well as appeals to be filed later. Where the tax effect fell below the revised threshold, the Revenue was required to withdraw or not press the appeal, subject to liberty to seek recall if the case fell within an exception or if the tax effect had been incorrectly computed. On that basis, the Revenue appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and the connected cross-objection became infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 19:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1804 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310605</link>
      <description>A CBDT circular enhancing the monetary limit for departmental appeals before the ITAT was treated as applicable to pending appeals as well as appeals to be filed later. Where the tax effect fell below the revised threshold, the Revenue was required to withdraw or not press the appeal, subject to liberty to seek recall if the case fell within an exception or if the tax effect had been incorrectly computed. On that basis, the Revenue appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and the connected cross-objection became infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>