<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1503 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310613</link>
    <description>Amicable settlement between the parties justified quashing of the FIR and the connected criminal proceedings under the High Court&#039;s inherent jurisdiction. The Court applied the settled principles governing Section 482 CrPC, focusing on whether intervention was necessary to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of law. It noted that the complainant had stated on record that she had no objection to quashing, and that the dispute was personal in nature. Even though the allegations included non-compoundable offences, continuation of the proceedings was found to serve no useful purpose after a genuine compromise, and the FIR was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 19:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1503 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310613</link>
      <description>Amicable settlement between the parties justified quashing of the FIR and the connected criminal proceedings under the High Court&#039;s inherent jurisdiction. The Court applied the settled principles governing Section 482 CrPC, focusing on whether intervention was necessary to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of law. It noted that the complainant had stated on record that she had no objection to quashing, and that the dispute was personal in nature. Even though the allegations included non-compoundable offences, continuation of the proceedings was found to serve no useful purpose after a genuine compromise, and the FIR was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>