<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 983 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310597</link>
    <description>Once final arguments are concluded and a civil suit is reserved for judgment, no further application can be moved before pronouncement of judgment under the Code of Civil Procedure. Reservation of judgment and delivery of judgment are consecutive stages, leaving no intervening procedural window for a party to seek additional orders. Authorities permitting applications at the argument stage were distinguished as inapplicable once the matter had been closed for judgment, and contrary views were rejected as inconsistent with the Supreme Court ruling relied upon. The party&#039;s application was therefore not maintainable after reservation of judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 15:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 983 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310597</link>
      <description>Once final arguments are concluded and a civil suit is reserved for judgment, no further application can be moved before pronouncement of judgment under the Code of Civil Procedure. Reservation of judgment and delivery of judgment are consecutive stages, leaving no intervening procedural window for a party to seek additional orders. Authorities permitting applications at the argument stage were distinguished as inapplicable once the matter had been closed for judgment, and contrary views were rejected as inconsistent with the Supreme Court ruling relied upon. The party&#039;s application was therefore not maintainable after reservation of judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>