https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445204 The Madras HC allowed the writ petition, setting aside an assessment order dated 29.06.2023 for violation of natural justice principles. The court found that petitioner was given insufficient time (less than 36 hours) to respond after notice was uploaded online on 21.06.2023, followed by two working days when petitioner couldn't access the website. Despite appearing on the next working day requesting time for document production, petitioner was denied adequate opportunity to file an effective reply. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration with proper adherence to natural justice principles. en-us Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445204 The Madras HC allowed the writ petition, setting aside an assessment order dated 29.06.2023 for violation of natural justice principles. The court found that petitioner was given insufficient time (less than 36 hours) to respond after notice was uploaded online on 21.06.2023, followed by two working days when petitioner couldn't access the website. Despite appearing on the next working day requesting time for document production, petitioner was denied adequate opportunity to file an effective reply. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration with proper adherence to natural justice principles. Case-Laws GST Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445204