<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445203</link>
    <description>The HC allowed writ petitions challenging GST penalty and seizure orders due to procedural irregularities. The court found violations of natural justice, as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to contest adverse inferences regarding weight discrepancies in e-way bills. The matter was remanded to the Additional Commissioner for a fresh decision within three months, ensuring proper hearing and compliance with legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 94 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445203</link>
      <description>The HC allowed writ petitions challenging GST penalty and seizure orders due to procedural irregularities. The court found violations of natural justice, as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to contest adverse inferences regarding weight discrepancies in e-way bills. The matter was remanded to the Additional Commissioner for a fresh decision within three months, ensuring proper hearing and compliance with legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>