<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 221 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, partially allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief. They held that the Customs Notification benefit should not be denied solely based on the car&#039;s prior registration, deeming it a technical formality. The Tribunal also reduced fines and penalties imposed for the EXIM Policy violation in accordance with the cited precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 221 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, partially allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief. They held that the Customs Notification benefit should not be denied solely based on the car&#039;s prior registration, deeming it a technical formality. The Tribunal also reduced fines and penalties imposed for the EXIM Policy violation in accordance with the cited precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>