<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1441 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310581</link>
    <description>SAT Mumbai upheld SEBI&#039;s findings that the company and directors orchestrated a fraudulent GDR scheme where only one entity subscribed to the entire issue using a loan secured by undisclosed pledge agreements. The tribunal found the company provided false subscriber information and failed to disclose material agreements to stock exchanges, violating securities regulations. However, SAT reduced penalties citing disproportionality: company&#039;s debarment reduced from five to three years, monetary penalty reduced to Rs. 25 lakhs, and directors&#039; penalties reduced to Rs. 2 lakhs each, while affirming the managing director&#039;s penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 13:19:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1441 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310581</link>
      <description>SAT Mumbai upheld SEBI&#039;s findings that the company and directors orchestrated a fraudulent GDR scheme where only one entity subscribed to the entire issue using a loan secured by undisclosed pledge agreements. The tribunal found the company provided false subscriber information and failed to disclose material agreements to stock exchanges, violating securities regulations. However, SAT reduced penalties citing disproportionality: company&#039;s debarment reduced from five to three years, monetary penalty reduced to Rs. 25 lakhs, and directors&#039; penalties reduced to Rs. 2 lakhs each, while affirming the managing director&#039;s penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>