<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445159</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax adjudication notice for E-way Bill misuse. Court held that statutory remedies exist for contesting the notice and emphasized the petitioner can raise defenses during adjudication proceedings. The decision does not prejudge the merits of the case but allows the tax authority to continue its investigation through proper legal channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445159</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax adjudication notice for E-way Bill misuse. Court held that statutory remedies exist for contesting the notice and emphasized the petitioner can raise defenses during adjudication proceedings. The decision does not prejudge the merits of the case but allows the tax authority to continue its investigation through proper legal channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>