<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 42 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445151</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC set aside a reassessment order where the AO reopened assessment based on information from the Investigation Directorate regarding LTCG from share trading. The assessee had explained purchasing shares in one company that was later amalgamated, resulting in receipt of shares in another company which were subsequently sold. The court found the AO failed to examine the original assessment order and the assessee&#039;s explanation, instead relying solely on general information received. The AO demonstrated non-application of mind and borrowed satisfaction, failing to connect the information to any non-disclosure by the assessee. The reassessment was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 08:48:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 42 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445151</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC set aside a reassessment order where the AO reopened assessment based on information from the Investigation Directorate regarding LTCG from share trading. The assessee had explained purchasing shares in one company that was later amalgamated, resulting in receipt of shares in another company which were subsequently sold. The court found the AO failed to examine the original assessment order and the assessee&#039;s explanation, instead relying solely on general information received. The AO demonstrated non-application of mind and borrowed satisfaction, failing to connect the information to any non-disclosure by the assessee. The reassessment was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>