<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 73 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34470</link>
    <description>Property used for offices, banks and garages was treated as a commercial establishment or complex and, on the stated facts, was held to be used for commercial purposes. In light of the amendment to the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 effective from 1 April 1993, such commercial property fell outside the definition of &quot;asset&quot; for wealth-tax purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the property was outside the taxable asset base was found to involve no substantial error of law, and the property was therefore not includible in net wealth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 73 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34470</link>
      <description>Property used for offices, banks and garages was treated as a commercial establishment or complex and, on the stated facts, was held to be used for commercial purposes. In light of the amendment to the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 effective from 1 April 1993, such commercial property fell outside the definition of &quot;asset&quot; for wealth-tax purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the property was outside the taxable asset base was found to involve no substantial error of law, and the property was therefore not includible in net wealth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>