<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 72 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34468</link>
    <description>The amended Section 35A(3) of the Central Excise Act withdrew the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; power to remand matters to the adjudicating authority with effect from 11.05.2001. Applying that settled position, the Commissioner (Appeals) could not send the case back for reconsideration after the deletion of remand power. The remand was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, and the appeal was directed to be decided afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 72 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34468</link>
      <description>The amended Section 35A(3) of the Central Excise Act withdrew the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; power to remand matters to the adjudicating authority with effect from 11.05.2001. Applying that settled position, the Commissioner (Appeals) could not send the case back for reconsideration after the deletion of remand power. The remand was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, and the appeal was directed to be decided afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>