<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 9 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellants from Rs.10 lakhs each to Rs.50,000 each. This decision considered the settlement by the main noticee, M/s. Micro Spares, under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and the appellants&#039; belief that they would be discharged as co-noticees. The Tribunal emphasized that reducing the penalty served the ends of justice, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 9 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellants from Rs.10 lakhs each to Rs.50,000 each. This decision considered the settlement by the main noticee, M/s. Micro Spares, under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and the appellants&#039; belief that they would be discharged as co-noticees. The Tribunal emphasized that reducing the penalty served the ends of justice, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>