https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310560 A surrendered person may be tried in India for a lesser offence disclosed by the facts proved for extradition, even if that offence is not expressly named in the extradition order. Applying that principle, the Court treated the extradition objection as failing. The evidence was sufficient to prove kidnapping, wrongful confinement and conspiracy against one accused, because the victim's detention, the relevant premises and vehicle, and the surrounding conduct supported the inference of concerted action. For the other accused, conspiracy-linked offences were upheld on the evidence of her presence and awareness, but the ransom charge failed for want of proof of the additional ransom element, so the acquittal on that count was restored. en-us Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:37:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310560 A surrendered person may be tried in India for a lesser offence disclosed by the facts proved for extradition, even if that offence is not expressly named in the extradition order. Applying that principle, the Court treated the extradition objection as failing. The evidence was sufficient to prove kidnapping, wrongful confinement and conspiracy against one accused, because the victim's detention, the relevant premises and vehicle, and the surrounding conduct supported the inference of concerted action. For the other accused, conspiracy-linked offences were upheld on the evidence of her presence and awareness, but the ransom charge failed for want of proof of the additional ransom element, so the acquittal on that count was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310560