<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1623 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310558</link>
    <description>Recognition under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 is a statutory precondition for offering teacher-education courses and admitting students; admissions made before recognition are illegal and cannot be regularised on equitable grounds, so refusal to allow the 1999 batch to sit for examination was upheld. Recognition and affiliation are separate requirements, and affiliation does not follow automatically from recognition; the examining body may still enforce eligibility and admission norms. In the peculiar facts, the 2002 and 2003 admissions, made after recognition and within intake, were treated as fit for regularisation subject to eligibility requirements, and the results were directed to be declared.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1623 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310558</link>
      <description>Recognition under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 is a statutory precondition for offering teacher-education courses and admitting students; admissions made before recognition are illegal and cannot be regularised on equitable grounds, so refusal to allow the 1999 batch to sit for examination was upheld. Recognition and affiliation are separate requirements, and affiliation does not follow automatically from recognition; the examining body may still enforce eligibility and admission norms. In the peculiar facts, the 2002 and 2003 admissions, made after recognition and within intake, were treated as fit for regularisation subject to eligibility requirements, and the results were directed to be declared.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>