https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310557 The court dismissed the arbitration petitions, determining that the arbitrator had provided both parties with full opportunity to present their cases and complied with mandatory procedures under Section 24 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act. The court found no evidence of bias or prejudice by the arbitrator, as the petitioner failed to substantiate such claims or file timely applications under Sections 12 and 13. The court held that the arbitrator acted fairly and within his discretion, and no order as to costs was made. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:05:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310557 The court dismissed the arbitration petitions, determining that the arbitrator had provided both parties with full opportunity to present their cases and complied with mandatory procedures under Section 24 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act. The court found no evidence of bias or prejudice by the arbitrator, as the petitioner failed to substantiate such claims or file timely applications under Sections 12 and 13. The court held that the arbitrator acted fairly and within his discretion, and no order as to costs was made. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310557