<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1327 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445104</link>
    <description>Whether the writ is maintainable despite expiry of the statutory appeal period under the GST regime - HC held that a writ under Art. 226 cannot substitute the statutory appellate remedy once the limitation for filing an appeal under s.107 has expired; relying on the SC precedent, the court found the petitioner&#039;s delay fatal and that merits-based relief cannot be sought by bypassing the appellate forum. Consequence: writ petition dismissed for being time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1327 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445104</link>
      <description>Whether the writ is maintainable despite expiry of the statutory appeal period under the GST regime - HC held that a writ under Art. 226 cannot substitute the statutory appellate remedy once the limitation for filing an appeal under s.107 has expired; relying on the SC precedent, the court found the petitioner&#039;s delay fatal and that merits-based relief cannot be sought by bypassing the appellate forum. Consequence: writ petition dismissed for being time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>