<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules Circular Allowing Principal Commissioner to Evaluate Refund Claims u/s 119(2)(b) is Illegal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72823</link>
    <description>Condoning the delay in preferring the refund application - Delegation of power - The circular authorises the Principal Commissioner to consider even the merits of the refund claim while exercising the delegated power u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act. This is plainly illegal for the mandate of the Act cannot be circumvented through any administrative circular issued by the Board. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:55:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:55:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules Circular Allowing Principal Commissioner to Evaluate Refund Claims u/s 119(2)(b) is Illegal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72823</link>
      <description>Condoning the delay in preferring the refund application - Delegation of power - The circular authorises the Principal Commissioner to consider even the merits of the refund claim while exercising the delegated power u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act. This is plainly illegal for the mandate of the Act cannot be circumvented through any administrative circular issued by the Board. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:55:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>