<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Entire MAP Funds as Income, Not Just the Difference: Assessing Officer&#039;s Approach Overturned.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72822</link>
    <description>Accrual of income - Money received under Marketing Assistance Programme [“MAP”] - It is also surprising that the AO chose to treat only the difference between the amounts received and spent, as income. In our view. if the amount received was income of the respondent/assessee, then the entire amount should have been treated as income. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:55:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Entire MAP Funds as Income, Not Just the Difference: Assessing Officer&#039;s Approach Overturned.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72822</link>
      <description>Accrual of income - Money received under Marketing Assistance Programme [“MAP”] - It is also surprising that the AO chose to treat only the difference between the amounts received and spent, as income. In our view. if the amount received was income of the respondent/assessee, then the entire amount should have been treated as income. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:55:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>