https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445084 SC affirmed CESTAT's finding that departmental evidence alleging undervaluation of imported linen, ramie and miscellaneous yarns failed legal scrutiny under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962; the department's revaluation and reliance on retracted statements were unsupported. The appeals challenging CESTAT's conclusion lacked merit and were dismissed. en-us Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Oct 2025 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445084 SC affirmed CESTAT's finding that departmental evidence alleging undervaluation of imported linen, ramie and miscellaneous yarns failed legal scrutiny under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962; the department's revaluation and reliance on retracted statements were unsupported. The appeals challenging CESTAT's conclusion lacked merit and were dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445084