https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310553 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only when the trial court's view is not a possible view, is perverse, or rests on irrelevant material; where two reasonable views exist, the one favouring acquittal prevails. Delay in forwarding the FIR or in recording witness statements is not fatal by itself if the surrounding circumstances explain it, but unexplained delay may weaken prosecution evidence. Recoveries under Section 27 of the Evidence Act must be reliably linked to the discovery, and eyewitness identification must be consistent and corroborated. On this analysis, the convictions of A-2, A-4, A-5, A-8 and A-9 were upheld, while the acquittal of A-10 to A-13 was restored. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2023 20:38:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310553 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only when the trial court's view is not a possible view, is perverse, or rests on irrelevant material; where two reasonable views exist, the one favouring acquittal prevails. Delay in forwarding the FIR or in recording witness statements is not fatal by itself if the surrounding circumstances explain it, but unexplained delay may weaken prosecution evidence. Recoveries under Section 27 of the Evidence Act must be reliably linked to the discovery, and eyewitness identification must be consistent and corroborated. On this analysis, the convictions of A-2, A-4, A-5, A-8 and A-9 were upheld, while the acquittal of A-10 to A-13 was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310553