https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310536 The appeal was allowed, overturning the HC's interim order of status quo. The court determined that the Respondent was not a tenant but an agent under the Dispensing Pump and Selling Licence (DPSL) agreement, which did not confer any possessory rights. The Respondent's claim of deemed tenancy under Section 15A of the old Bombay Rent Act was rejected, as their occupation was on behalf of the Appellant and not independent. The Appellant was granted the right to take possession of the premises, and the trial court was instructed to expedite the suit's resolution. en-us Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310536 The appeal was allowed, overturning the HC's interim order of status quo. The court determined that the Respondent was not a tenant but an agent under the Dispensing Pump and Selling Licence (DPSL) agreement, which did not confer any possessory rights. The Respondent's claim of deemed tenancy under Section 15A of the old Bombay Rent Act was rejected, as their occupation was on behalf of the Appellant and not independent. The Appellant was granted the right to take possession of the premises, and the trial court was instructed to expedite the suit's resolution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310536