https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310534 A statutory notice under Section 447 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act was required only where the complained-of act was done or purportedly done under the Act; because the dispute concerned ownership and possession, no notice was necessary. The Firman relied on by the Corporation was not itself law and could not automatically extinguish private rights or conclusively vest the disputed land in the Corporation; its legal effect had to be assessed on the facts. The record was insufficient to finally resolve title and possession, so the matter was remitted for fresh determination on those issues and the High Court's dismissal of the suit was set aside. en-us Thu, 20 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:20:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310534 A statutory notice under Section 447 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act was required only where the complained-of act was done or purportedly done under the Act; because the dispute concerned ownership and possession, no notice was necessary. The Firman relied on by the Corporation was not itself law and could not automatically extinguish private rights or conclusively vest the disputed land in the Corporation; its legal effect had to be assessed on the facts. The record was insufficient to finally resolve title and possession, so the matter was remitted for fresh determination on those issues and the High Court's dismissal of the suit was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310534