https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310528 A satisfied foreclosure decree was held to be spent once the decretal amount was paid within the enlarged time and accepted by the mortgagees. Because that decree, in common form, did not provide machinery to adjust the successive redemption rights of puisne incumbrancers and co-owners, the executing court could not expand it in execution to determine those inter se rights. Section 244 of the Civil Procedure Code therefore did not bar a subsequent suit. A fresh decree was required to work out the parties' interests and redemption rights arising after satisfaction of the earlier decree. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 1905 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:46:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310528 A satisfied foreclosure decree was held to be spent once the decretal amount was paid within the enlarged time and accepted by the mortgagees. Because that decree, in common form, did not provide machinery to adjust the successive redemption rights of puisne incumbrancers and co-owners, the executing court could not expand it in execution to determine those inter se rights. Section 244 of the Civil Procedure Code therefore did not bar a subsequent suit. A fresh decree was required to work out the parties' interests and redemption rights arising after satisfaction of the earlier decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Mar 1905 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310528