https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310526 An alleged oral gift of village Khagsiamau was rejected because the evidence did not prove that any completed gift had been made, so the transaction was not binding on the plaintiff. The reconveyance of mortgagee rights in the villages listed in list 5 was also held to be beyond the authority created by the family settlement, since the holder was required to preserve and enforce the mortgage rights for the estate rather than divert the benefit to a son-in-law. The pleadings were treated as sufficient because the transaction itself disclosed the substance of the alleged misuse. The plaintiff's title was upheld, and the reconveyance was ineffective against her. en-us Fri, 21 Sep 1934 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2023 16:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310526 An alleged oral gift of village Khagsiamau was rejected because the evidence did not prove that any completed gift had been made, so the transaction was not binding on the plaintiff. The reconveyance of mortgagee rights in the villages listed in list 5 was also held to be beyond the authority created by the family settlement, since the holder was required to preserve and enforce the mortgage rights for the estate rather than divert the benefit to a son-in-law. The pleadings were treated as sufficient because the transaction itself disclosed the substance of the alleged misuse. The plaintiff's title was upheld, and the reconveyance was ineffective against her. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Sep 1934 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310526