https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310523 Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, a plaint can be rejected only on the plaint averments, and where specific allegations disclose a cause of action against defendants Nos. 3 and 4, they cannot be deleted as unnecessary or improperly joined at that stage; their impleadment was therefore upheld. A single legal entity does not become two separate defendants merely because it operates from different addresses, so the party description should reflect one defendant with multiple office addresses. The memo of parties was accordingly directed to be corrected only to that limited extent. en-us Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2023 11:58:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310523 Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, a plaint can be rejected only on the plaint averments, and where specific allegations disclose a cause of action against defendants Nos. 3 and 4, they cannot be deleted as unnecessary or improperly joined at that stage; their impleadment was therefore upheld. A single legal entity does not become two separate defendants merely because it operates from different addresses, so the party description should reflect one defendant with multiple office addresses. The memo of parties was accordingly directed to be corrected only to that limited extent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310523