https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310521 A certificate under section 9 of the Diplomatic Relations (Vienna Convention) Act, 1972 is conclusive evidence on entitlement to privilege or immunity, but it operates as a rule of evidence and not as an automatic threshold bar. Its effect depends on the facts and evidence before the trial court, so it was not finally acted on at the revision stage. A plaint also cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC on material beyond its averments; the tenancy and wrongful dispossession allegations, together with questions on diplomatic immunity, commercial activity, Article 31, and section 86 CPC, required adjudication on evidence. The rejection of the plaint was therefore unsustainable. en-us Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2023 11:45:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310521 A certificate under section 9 of the Diplomatic Relations (Vienna Convention) Act, 1972 is conclusive evidence on entitlement to privilege or immunity, but it operates as a rule of evidence and not as an automatic threshold bar. Its effect depends on the facts and evidence before the trial court, so it was not finally acted on at the revision stage. A plaint also cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC on material beyond its averments; the tenancy and wrongful dispossession allegations, together with questions on diplomatic immunity, commercial activity, Article 31, and section 86 CPC, required adjudication on evidence. The rejection of the plaint was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310521