<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 53 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34448</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that payments made by the assessee constituted undisclosed income, supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions. The Court found that the payments were not adequately evidenced and were ultimately deemed income of the Director. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating no substantial legal question arose, and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s findings under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 53 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34448</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that payments made by the assessee constituted undisclosed income, supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions. The Court found that the payments were not adequately evidenced and were ultimately deemed income of the Director. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating no substantial legal question arose, and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s findings under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>