<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules No Deductions for Purchases Made Without Account Payee Cheques u/s 40A(3) for This Assessment Year.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72803</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 40A(3) - purchases made otherwise than by account payee cheque - Genuineness of expenses - Even if the petitioner’s/assessee’s case fell within the ambit of the 1977 circular, the petitioner/assessee could not have been allowed deductions on the subject payments made by the petitioner/assessee as the rule under which leeway was claimed did not exist for the AY in question. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 08:50:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 08:50:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules No Deductions for Purchases Made Without Account Payee Cheques u/s 40A(3) for This Assessment Year.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72803</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 40A(3) - purchases made otherwise than by account payee cheque - Genuineness of expenses - Even if the petitioner’s/assessee’s case fell within the ambit of the 1977 circular, the petitioner/assessee could not have been allowed deductions on the subject payments made by the petitioner/assessee as the rule under which leeway was claimed did not exist for the AY in question. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 08:50:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>