<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1272 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445049</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that reassessment proceedings under section 147 were invalid due to insufficient reasons recorded by the AO. The AO failed to provide specific details regarding alleged bogus transactions, including the identity of entities involved, transaction dates, nature of transactions, and documentary evidence. The reassessment was initiated based on vague references to documents seized during search operations at another entity, without proper examination or verification of facts. The AO merely listed the assessee company among 195 companies without detailing specific transactions constituting unexplained income. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2023 21:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1272 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445049</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that reassessment proceedings under section 147 were invalid due to insufficient reasons recorded by the AO. The AO failed to provide specific details regarding alleged bogus transactions, including the identity of entities involved, transaction dates, nature of transactions, and documentary evidence. The reassessment was initiated based on vague references to documents seized during search operations at another entity, without proper examination or verification of facts. The AO merely listed the assessee company among 195 companies without detailing specific transactions constituting unexplained income. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>