https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310518 Rule 26 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 treats an appeal as filed on the date of initial lodgement when it is received with defects, returned for compliance, and the defects are cured within the time allowed; the later numbering does not amount to a fresh filing. On that basis, the appeal in question related back to the original date and was within the extended limitation period. The document also states that a delay of 42 days beyond the initial limitation period was supported by sufficient cause, namely the death of the appellant's uncle, and was therefore liable to be condoned. en-us Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 29 Oct 2023 20:19:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310518 Rule 26 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 treats an appeal as filed on the date of initial lodgement when it is received with defects, returned for compliance, and the defects are cured within the time allowed; the later numbering does not amount to a fresh filing. On that basis, the appeal in question related back to the original date and was within the extended limitation period. The document also states that a delay of 42 days beyond the initial limitation period was supported by sufficient cause, namely the death of the appellant's uncle, and was therefore liable to be condoned. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310518