<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1053 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310512</link>
    <description>Licence fees received for transfer of user rights in software were examined as to whether they constituted royalty under Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12 of the India-Germany tax treaty, and whether amended Explanation 4 to Section 9(1)(vi) operated retrospectively from 1 June 1976. The Bombay HC admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law, but made no final adjudication on the merits of either issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:13:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1053 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310512</link>
      <description>Licence fees received for transfer of user rights in software were examined as to whether they constituted royalty under Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12 of the India-Germany tax treaty, and whether amended Explanation 4 to Section 9(1)(vi) operated retrospectively from 1 June 1976. The Bombay HC admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law, but made no final adjudication on the merits of either issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>