<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1053 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310512</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC ruled that the license fees received for the transfer of user rights of the software &quot;OPUS&quot; to Indian companies qualify as &quot;royalty&quot; under the Income Tax Act and the India-Germany DTAA. The court upheld the retrospective application of the amendment clarifying the definition of royalty concerning software rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:13:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1053 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310512</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC ruled that the license fees received for the transfer of user rights of the software &quot;OPUS&quot; to Indian companies qualify as &quot;royalty&quot; under the Income Tax Act and the India-Germany DTAA. The court upheld the retrospective application of the amendment clarifying the definition of royalty concerning software rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>