<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1431 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310494</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petitioner to inspect documents and obtain photocopies upon payment, without addressing the issue of maintainability. The deadline for responding to a notice under the Securitization Act was extended to August 31, 2021. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2023 08:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1431 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310494</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petitioner to inspect documents and obtain photocopies upon payment, without addressing the issue of maintainability. The deadline for responding to a notice under the Securitization Act was extended to August 31, 2021. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>