<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1465 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310496</link>
    <description>The Calcutta HC dismissed a bail application filed by the former Chairman of a Commission who served from January 2014 to July 2018. The petitioner was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly facilitating appointment of undeserving candidates as assistant teachers in Classes IX and X through fraudulent recommendation letters. The Court classified the case as Category D offence, noting the gravity of corruption charges, the petitioner&#039;s involvement in similar cases, and ongoing Enforcement Directorate inquiry. Despite being in custody for only three months, the Court deemed it imprudent to grant bail considering the serious nature of the allegations and potential for influencing the investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2023 08:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1465 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310496</link>
      <description>The Calcutta HC dismissed a bail application filed by the former Chairman of a Commission who served from January 2014 to July 2018. The petitioner was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly facilitating appointment of undeserving candidates as assistant teachers in Classes IX and X through fraudulent recommendation letters. The Court classified the case as Category D offence, noting the gravity of corruption charges, the petitioner&#039;s involvement in similar cases, and ongoing Enforcement Directorate inquiry. Despite being in custody for only three months, the Court deemed it imprudent to grant bail considering the serious nature of the allegations and potential for influencing the investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>