https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310510 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to a 246-day delay in filing, rejecting the appellant's request for condonation of delay. It found the appellant's reasons unsubstantiated and attributed the delay to negligence and inaction, which could have been avoided with due diligence. The Tribunal determined that no substantial question of law arose and emphasized the necessity for appellants to demonstrate reasonable cause beyond their control for delays. The decision was grounded in the factual context and relevant legal precedents, concluding that substantial justice would not be served by condoning the delay. en-us Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Oct 2023 08:35:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310510 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to a 246-day delay in filing, rejecting the appellant's request for condonation of delay. It found the appellant's reasons unsubstantiated and attributed the delay to negligence and inaction, which could have been avoided with due diligence. The Tribunal determined that no substantial question of law arose and emphasized the necessity for appellants to demonstrate reasonable cause beyond their control for delays. The decision was grounded in the factual context and relevant legal precedents, concluding that substantial justice would not be served by condoning the delay. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310510