https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34435 A delay of about 290 days in filing an appeal was not condoned because no sufficient cause was shown. The appellant argued that relied-upon documents had not been supplied, but the record indicated that the documents were supplied and the grievance could have been raised earlier in the appeal itself. As the appellant had already contested the matter before the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) without those documents, the Tribunal found no justifiable impediment preventing timely filing and rejected the condonation application. en-us Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34435 A delay of about 290 days in filing an appeal was not condoned because no sufficient cause was shown. The appellant argued that relied-upon documents had not been supplied, but the record indicated that the documents were supplied and the grievance could have been raised earlier in the appeal itself. As the appellant had already contested the matter before the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) without those documents, the Tribunal found no justifiable impediment preventing timely filing and rejected the condonation application. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34435