https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444987 A revisional court is required to decide only the issues actually placed before it, and an unchallenged order on a separate objection attains finality. Here, the revision concerned only closure of the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant, and the court granted one effective opportunity subject to costs. The complaint-maintainability objection under Section 219 CrPC had already been rejected by an order that was never separately challenged, so the revisional court was not obliged to rule on it. The challenge to the revisional order therefore failed. en-us Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Oct 2023 08:32:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444987 A revisional court is required to decide only the issues actually placed before it, and an unchallenged order on a separate objection attains finality. Here, the revision concerned only closure of the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant, and the court granted one effective opportunity subject to costs. The complaint-maintainability objection under Section 219 CrPC had already been rejected by an order that was never separately challenged, so the revisional court was not obliged to rule on it. The challenge to the revisional order therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444987