https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34420 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the directive to deposit 50% of the duty amount by the appellate tribunal. The court found the petitioner's vague assertion of undue hardship without substantial evidence insufficient. Despite the tribunal's leniency in requiring only a 50% deposit, the court saw no justification to interfere with the order, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. Additionally, the court deemed the writ petition unsustainable due to the appealable nature of orders under Section 35(F) of the Central Excise Act, as the petitioner did not appeal the order. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition and vacated the interim order without imposing costs. en-us Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34420 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the directive to deposit 50% of the duty amount by the appellate tribunal. The court found the petitioner's vague assertion of undue hardship without substantial evidence insufficient. Despite the tribunal's leniency in requiring only a 50% deposit, the court saw no justification to interfere with the order, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. Additionally, the court deemed the writ petition unsustainable due to the appealable nature of orders under Section 35(F) of the Central Excise Act, as the petitioner did not appeal the order. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition and vacated the interim order without imposing costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34420