<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 157 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34418</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, emphasizing the need for substantial justice. Despite an employee&#039;s negligence in informing the management about the Order-in-Original, the delay was deemed unintentional. Relying on the elasticity of &#039;sufficient cause&#039; under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act and the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, the Tribunal decided in favor of condoning the delay to serve the ends of justice. The decision highlighted the importance of deciding cases on their merits rather than technicalities, ultimately directing the registry to list the stay petition for disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 157 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34418</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, emphasizing the need for substantial justice. Despite an employee&#039;s negligence in informing the management about the Order-in-Original, the delay was deemed unintentional. Relying on the elasticity of &#039;sufficient cause&#039; under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act and the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, the Tribunal decided in favor of condoning the delay to serve the ends of justice. The decision highlighted the importance of deciding cases on their merits rather than technicalities, ultimately directing the registry to list the stay petition for disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>