<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1208 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444985</link>
    <description>Section 19 of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, read with Article 246A, preserved existing tax laws during the GST transition and also allowed competent legislatures to amend or repeal them within that limited window, including curative or validating changes; that power was not confined to mere textual conformity with the amended Constitution. Once the GST regime commenced and the legislative field had shifted, however, later amendments to the erstwhile VAT laws could not be sustained for want of competence. On that basis, the Telangana validating amendment, the Gujarat retrospective amendment, and the Maharashtra mandatory pre-deposit amendment were all held invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1208 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444985</link>
      <description>Section 19 of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, read with Article 246A, preserved existing tax laws during the GST transition and also allowed competent legislatures to amend or repeal them within that limited window, including curative or validating changes; that power was not confined to mere textual conformity with the amended Constitution. Once the GST regime commenced and the legislative field had shifted, however, later amendments to the erstwhile VAT laws could not be sustained for want of competence. On that basis, the Telangana validating amendment, the Gujarat retrospective amendment, and the Maharashtra mandatory pre-deposit amendment were all held invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>