<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1180 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444957</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. The tribunal held that corporate guarantee commission at 0.35% per annum was at arm&#039;s length, requiring no transfer pricing adjustment, following coordinate bench decisions. Regarding disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, the tribunal found the AO&#039;s dissatisfaction was recorded mechanically without proper regard to the assessee&#039;s accounts and suo moto disallowance computation, thus deleting the addition. The tribunal also deleted adjustments in book profit computation under Section 115JB as the AO made no discussion or addition in the assessment order. TDS credit claim was allowed following a previous ITAT decision favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1180 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444957</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. The tribunal held that corporate guarantee commission at 0.35% per annum was at arm&#039;s length, requiring no transfer pricing adjustment, following coordinate bench decisions. Regarding disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, the tribunal found the AO&#039;s dissatisfaction was recorded mechanically without proper regard to the assessee&#039;s accounts and suo moto disallowance computation, thus deleting the addition. The tribunal also deleted adjustments in book profit computation under Section 115JB as the AO made no discussion or addition in the assessment order. TDS credit claim was allowed following a previous ITAT decision favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>