https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444954 CESTAT Mumbai-AT allowed the appeal against revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposition. The court found undue delay in adjudication proceedings from September 2019 import transaction to May 2023 order without proper justification. Revenue failed to establish violations of CBLR 2018 Regulations 10(d), (e), (f), (m), and (q). The FSSAI rejection report was communicated to appellants only after goods clearance, making it impossible for them to advise customs authorities beforehand. No evidence supported allegations of information withholding, inefficiency, or non-cooperation by appellants. The court concluded that principles of natural justice were not observed and the order was factually incorrect and legally unsustainable. en-us Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:44:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444954 CESTAT Mumbai-AT allowed the appeal against revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposition. The court found undue delay in adjudication proceedings from September 2019 import transaction to May 2023 order without proper justification. Revenue failed to establish violations of CBLR 2018 Regulations 10(d), (e), (f), (m), and (q). The FSSAI rejection report was communicated to appellants only after goods clearance, making it impossible for them to advise customs authorities beforehand. No evidence supported allegations of information withholding, inefficiency, or non-cooperation by appellants. The court concluded that principles of natural justice were not observed and the order was factually incorrect and legally unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444954