https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444947 Section 301(2) CrPC was treated as permitting only limited assistance to the prosecution, not a general right of impleadment, so a third party claiming journalistic status could not enter the proceedings on that basis and the request was rejected. On the PMLA issue, the Court held that money-laundering proceedings under Section 3 depend on a surviving scheduled offence and cannot be sustained on a purely notional predicate once the scheduled offence has been finally closed. Because the underlying dispute had been settled and no material showed proceeds of crime, the ECIR-linked summons were quashed, while liberty was preserved to proceed again if the predicate offence is later revived. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444947 Section 301(2) CrPC was treated as permitting only limited assistance to the prosecution, not a general right of impleadment, so a third party claiming journalistic status could not enter the proceedings on that basis and the request was rejected. On the PMLA issue, the Court held that money-laundering proceedings under Section 3 depend on a surviving scheduled offence and cannot be sustained on a purely notional predicate once the scheduled offence has been finally closed. Because the underlying dispute had been settled and no material showed proceeds of crime, the ECIR-linked summons were quashed, while liberty was preserved to proceed again if the predicate offence is later revived. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444947