<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1162 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444939</link>
    <description>Entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE depended on proof that commercial production had commenced on or before the specified cut-off date. CESTAT noted that contemporaneous records, including purchase documents, electricity and meter data, VAT and sales tax papers, pollution control clearance, registration documents, invoices and verification material, established prior commencement of production. The department&#039;s objection that the unit was found closed during inspection was not supported by cogent corroborative evidence and could not displace the documentary record. On that basis, the mandatory condition for exemption was held satisfied and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1162 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444939</link>
      <description>Entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE depended on proof that commercial production had commenced on or before the specified cut-off date. CESTAT noted that contemporaneous records, including purchase documents, electricity and meter data, VAT and sales tax papers, pollution control clearance, registration documents, invoices and verification material, established prior commencement of production. The department&#039;s objection that the unit was found closed during inspection was not supported by cogent corroborative evidence and could not displace the documentary record. On that basis, the mandatory condition for exemption was held satisfied and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>