<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rejects Revenue&#039;s Attempt to Extend Limitation Period in Chewing Tobacco Case; Higher Authority Disagrees.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72735</link>
    <description>Invocation of extended period of limitation - chewing tobacco - the tribunal by cryptic order has negatived the contentions of the Revenue and held that the invocation of the extended period of limitation was not warranted. This finding, not being in consonance with the facts obtained on the hand, we are unable to subscribe our views to the judgment of the tribunal. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:11:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:11:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rejects Revenue&#039;s Attempt to Extend Limitation Period in Chewing Tobacco Case; Higher Authority Disagrees.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72735</link>
      <description>Invocation of extended period of limitation - chewing tobacco - the tribunal by cryptic order has negatived the contentions of the Revenue and held that the invocation of the extended period of limitation was not warranted. This finding, not being in consonance with the facts obtained on the hand, we are unable to subscribe our views to the judgment of the tribunal. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:11:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>